Speaking about atom structure we will explain unfoundedness of quantum-mechanical atomic model. Let’s elucidate why existent explanations doesn’t satisfy us.
At first, electron moving in the neighborhood of nucleus will emit, whatever Bor and his followers affirm. Otherwise it will never emit, because every curved trajectory of electron can be described as sum of circles with radiuses, which satisfy the requirements, which Bor claimed to electron in the neighborhood of nucleus.
Secondly de Broglie waves will occur in that case. Scientists preferred to forget about it too.
Thirdly, using the formula …, we come to the conclusion, that only radius changes. But product of multiplication of radius and velocity must change. Size of molecules must change in proportion to the radius of orbitals. That lets to the expansion of matter. But there is no such proportional expansion.
Fourthly, compulsory appearance of magnetic effect isn’t mentioned too. Such a wonderful scientists’ forgetfulness.
Discreteness of spectrums is explained by the instrumentality of electron energy quantization. Principle of continuity doesn’t concede such quantization. One of the states of electron in atom, when electron doesn’t emit, is possible when electron rests. But there is another contradiction. It results from common conviction, that system consisting of two and more free charges can’t be stable. But I think, it is possible to argue with this idea. Here is quotation from the textbook.
“Comparing equations of Colomb’s law and law of universal gravitation we notice, that these equations are correct for point bodies (mass points and point electric charge). In such state equations are correct for spherical bodies located not concentrically, if they are homogeneous by density or location of electrical charges. Electrostatic and gravitation forces depend on coordinates of interacting bodies and have central direction (they affect along the line binding interacting charged mass points). Colomb forces become apparent in case of lack of immediate contact between interacting bodies”. *(6)
We have picture which is analogous to picture derived by quantum mechanic as a result of a great amount of mathematical contrivances. But in our case electron has no necessity to rotate (or move in another way) around the proton. But we have to doubt in value of radius of electron. But for example radius of a proton calculated using by the instrumentality of suppositions used for calculating of classic radius of electron doesn’t coincide with the experimental result at all. On the assumption of our reasonings we det a conclusion that radius of electron is significantly more.
Alternative site in Russian contains more information. It added new pages, pictures, and 8 clips of computer animation. Go to Russion version page.
Forward Back
Search on pages of a site