Aliens develop Earth Science
 



The general theory of interactions is alternative to
the quantum mechanics and the relativity theory.

The new theory explains the reasons of occurrence of quantum effects
and shows as well as why the space is bent.
 
The author Ipatov Paul

 

Aliens develop earth science

Analysis of the alien's message led to the creation of a new scientific theory.

We are sincerely glad that you have visited this page. The high goals and their realization are defined here.

A lot of people and even organizations in many countries around the world are trying to find signs of existence of the reasonable Extraterrestrial civilizations in the Universe. These attempts haven’t been successful. Meanwhile…

In 1929 on the wave of 75 meters was caught an unusual radio transmission. Someone, who called NIKOMO and introduced himself as an Envoy of extraterrestrial civilizations, was reading two-hour memorandum in different languages - now the name of it is the COD message. The radio transmission had been continued only one day. There was partly mentioned in the book by Brad Steiger “Meeting with the strange” (1977) and in the broadcast of soviet television “UFO - undeclared visit” (1990).

Interestingly, the same situation was repeated again. November 27, 1977 more to the south-west of London, in the territory looked like a circle with a diameter of 120 kilometers, was violated TV broadcasting. The image was disappeared from the screens, and an unidentified voice said that he was the representative of extraterrestrial civilizations that the earth's civilization had a wrong way, earthmen had to destroy all weapon of evil – time for it would very little, and if people didn’t take any action, they had to leave the Galaxy.

The Specialists of the London television, who investigated this affair, said that they couldn’t imagine what jokers were able to realize it. Because for such an action is necessary to have a very cumbersome and expensive equipment. Information about the incident was transmitted with radio station “The Voice of America” and the soviet radio November 28, 1977 in the evening “The International Panorama”. In connection with this situation the representative of the British police assured audience that the «alien» would soon appear in the faces of the earthmen on the dock. However, these assurances were empty words.

The third message aliens to mankind

(It was given in 1929 A.D.) The Coalition’s Observer Detachment further referred to as COD appeals to the intelligent inhabitants of Earth, to the race that call themselves Mankind. This appeal by COD to earthlings is the third, monitoring message. The first COD message was transmitted in 576 B.C. (may be A.D. – we print by publication which published in “The Siberian newspaper”,1990, № 40) to the inhabitants of the city of Apuradhapura, the largest on Earth at that time. The second message was transmitted by COD in 711 A.D. to the inhabitants of the city of Tqaatzetcoatl, then the largest on the American continent.

The present COD message to earthlings is basically identical to the former two in content and is composed in the currently main languages of Earth – Chinese, English, Russian and Spanish. The text of the message is adjusted to the earthlings’ present level of knowledge and misconceptions. The purpose of the message is to propose negotiations to be conducted at some future time between representatives of Mankind and the Coalition on the subject of Mankind joining the Coalition.

As the negotiations can be conducted only after certain conditions have been met by Mankind, these conditions are listed below, preceded for their correct understanding by brief information of cosmogonic nature as well as a comparative characterization of Mankind’s way of thinking.

Message aliens: Chapter I

Mankind’s notion of the Universe is on the whole more adequate now than it was at the times of the two previous messages. Indeed, Earth is not flat and is not at the center of the Universe.

Earth indeed orbits the Sun as one of the planets. The Sun is indeed not at the center of the Universe, but is a star in the Galaxy.

The last of energy transformations supporting the activity of stars and of the Sun accordingly, thereby enabling the existence of life on Earth and similar planets, is indeed the thermonuclear reaction.

The intelligent race of earthlings is indeed not the only one in the Universe. Most of your other cosmogonic conjectures are erroneous.

Your scientists’ belief in the existence of certain immutable laws of the Universe, even though undiscovered as yet, and in the stability of world constants is a misconception. Thus, the gravitational constant varies perceptibly even within your Solar system, let alone on larger scales, which has caused grave errors in your calculations of the dimensions of your Galaxy and of the distance to other galaxies, and it has also resulted in the emergence of fallacious theories of the closed Universe, as well as the recent theory of the dispersing Universe.

The notion of universal three-dimensionality of space, on which your cosmogonic conceptions are mainly based, is also mistaken. The world is chaotic, nothing in it is immutable, and that includes dimensionality. Space dimensionality in the Universe fluctuates and changes smoothly within very wide ranges. The best condition for the emergence of organic life is space dimensionality equal to π (3,14159...). Wide deviations from that value are detrimental to living nature. Space dimensionality in the vicinity of the Solar system is +3,00017... at present, and the proximity of this number to the integer 3 has misled you.

In the vicinity of your cluster of galaxies a gravitational cyclone is drifting with space dimensionality of –3,15... in its center, which can brush against your Galaxy, destroying organic life on all the planets where protection measures will not be taken.

In particular, this circumstance makes it imperative for Mankind to join the Coalition as soon as possible, not later than 65 millennia since the transmission of the present message in 1929 A.D., in order to give the Coalition enough time to help Mankind in preparing for the cyclone.

About 220 thousand intelligent races in your Galaxy have already joined the Coalition, and about a thousand intelligent races, including yours, are considering that step.

COD is asking you not to treat our warning about the gravitational cyclone as an attempt to influence your response.

You are mistaken in your answer to the question about the origins of the Solar system and of life on Earth. The Solar system originated from a dust nebula seeded by the Coalition’s Construction Detachment in a region of the Universe satisfying the two basic requirements to the conditions for the emergence and development of organic life:

· sufficient distance from other stars;

· space dimensionality close to π.

You are mistaken in likening an intelligent race to a living individual as you envision Mankind’s senescence and death as inevitable at some future time. In the evolutionary process new species of living beings descend from some old species, and you should see to it that new species of intelligent races on Earth descend from yours. Nevertheless, as COD has observed, Mankind is not at all guided by this or a similar strategy, leaving your development to providence and directing all your efforts towards the satisfaction of your short-term needs.

You should not think that your misconceptions are accidental, transient. They are inevitable and persistent due to the peculiarities of your thinking, a brief analysis of which is presented in the next chapter.



Message aliens: Chapter II

The thinking of living matter and the very existence and development of living matter rest on a common foundation. Both are counterflows to entropy. In thinking this counterflow is expressed by the search for logicality. The search for logicality is intrinsic to your thinking as well, but the similarity of your thinking to the way of thinking intrinsic to most of the intelligent races in the Coalition goes no further than that.

This circumstance makes many members of COD doubt whether it is appropriate to address you as an intelligent race. Your logic is based on the notions of ‘yes’ and ‘no’ as presumably existing in reality and reiterating in step-by-step analysis of any complex problem, with the number of steps in the analysis being finite and mostly very small, even when a rather serious problem is considered. The search for the answer is confined to the choice of one out of two, where 2 is the number of steps, possible solutions, whereas the most adequate solution mostly lies between them.

Your mathematicians will understand the following analogy: the solution of a problem emerging after particular questions of the yes-or-no type are solved is similar to the choice of a single vertex of an N-dimensional cube, whereas the space of possible solutions in the first approximation are all the points in the N-dimensional space. Without further specification the real dimensionality of the solution space is mostly determined by you erroneously and is very seldom really integer-valued.

Our acceptance of you as an intelligent race is also hampered by the following considerations. As far as we can judge, any scientific or juridical law, the essence of a discovery or invention, the gist of any thought can be expressed by you in a sentence comprising at most 100 words from a vocabulary of 50 thousand, including mathematical and other conventional notations. The total number of possible sentences with such a vocabulary is a very modest figure equal to 50,000100. But if only sentences with linguistic (diagnostic) consistency are left, their number will go down to 50,00050.5. If sentences are then discarded in which the words are grammatically linked correctly, but their content has not even a shade of sense, the number of apparently sensible sentences will drop to 50,00025. Sifting false statements from true ones leaves, by the most liberal estimates, an inventory of at most 3,9 × 1037 statements that could be made by you and would be adequate to reality.

Meanwhile representatives of the animal world on various planets are known to be capable of responding to various combinations of outer stimuli by no fewer diverse unconditional reactions quite adequate to reality, but cannot, however, be called intelligent.

Mankind should apparently be regarded more adequately as not an intelligent race, but intelligent potentially, because restricted thinking is not, after all, inherent in you.

The human brain is naturally endowed with a thinking apparatus no less perfect than thinking organs of members of numerous intelligent races in the Universe. But from the very beginning the development of your thinking took an absolutely fallacious path.

At the start of the development of the thinking process the ability to think is based on the potential possibility of diverse reactions to the same informational impact. In the graph, further referred to as the logical foundation, the force or perceptibility of the reaction to informational impact is set on the vertical line, while on the horizontal line the acceptability, pleasantness of the reaction is set to the right of zero and its unacceptability, unpleasantness to the left. Like everything in nature that has not yet been processed by the activity of the mind counteracting entropy, this graph is chaotic, the peaks of the curve in it are caused by purely physiological threshold effects, the self-education of the mind involves not only building the complex system of logical thinking, but also rebuilding and improving the foundation on which that system is based. As demonstrated by the example of numerous intelligent races, rebuilding the logical foundation in accordance with the outline presented below is the best way to meet the requirements for successful comprehension of nature.

It should be mentioned that several intelligent races in the Universe are known to us, whose logical foundation has a rectilinear structure with branches extending to infinity. The constitute their own Union of Races and are not members in the Coalition, because we have been unable to find a common language with them. The fundamental difference between their thinking and ours is that the area of the figure circumscribing the logical foundation is finite for us, but infinite in their thinking. We even find it hard to imagine how they perceive existence, and we cannot understand what preserves their life under the fierce impact of positive and negative informational forces extending to boundless infinity.

Man’s crude logical foundation has two visible peaks to the right and left of zero as well as a few minor ones. Its exploration shows that man has never had any obstacles to tuning your logical foundation in accordance with the outline generally adopted in the Universe. Nevertheless, man’s mind has developed in the totally fallacious way from the very start, guided by these peaks, and now has its own kind of logical foundation. These high peaks to the left and right of zero are what you call “no” and “yes”, without which you are unable in principle to conceive a phenomenon. However, you only obey the force of habit. The intentional splitting of the logical foundation into the notions of “no” and “yes” is the most serious obstacle on your path to comprehend existence. Moreover, the theoretical investigations of logical thinking conducted by you only aggravate the fallacy instead of correcting it. Your theoretical logical systems operate only with refined notions of ‘yes’ and ‘no’, ruling out other variants of logical reactions. These investigations are a step back even as compared with the logical foundation of man’s thinking as presented in the above graph, since the finite area of the figure circumscribing the logical foundation turns into zero.

It can be said in terms of your mathematical language that your logic is based on a discrete logical foundation instead of a continuous one, and the most primitive function with only two values is taken as its basis. The inevitable conclusion is that even if your way of perceiving existence can be called thinking, this is the most primitive of all the possible systems of thinking.

Discretization of logic forces you to expand the discretization principle onto all that exists. Thus the natural sequence, which is essentially a possible, but very artificial mathematical contrivance that has little to do with real nature, has become the basis for those rudiments of mathematics with which the overwhelming majority of Mankind are only familiar. You goal to count everything indiscriminately, but are incapable of accurately telling, say, the strength of wind, unless it is expressed numerically in points on a scale or in pressure on a square meter or mile, and these three numbers expressing the same strength of wind, will not evoke the same reaction from you until you carry out additional calculations to make certain that they indeed testify to the same.

Arithmetical calculation has caused the appearance of puzzles induced not by world reality, but by the primitivity of your thinking. Nevertheless, you waste your efforts on trying to solve them and harmonize with your view of the world as actual natural enigmas – for instance, the disposition of rational and irrational numbers on the real axis.

Discretization of logic makes you dismember what is perceived integrally into disparate facts, phenomena, notions and categories, drawing artificial borders between them.

Discretization of logic and the principle of calculation prompt you to regard the number of properties in a thing as finite and give names to each of them. This provides the highly questionable possibility to separate certain properties from others – a device you call abstraction. You regard moving by steps of abstraction towards more general properties as the only correct path to the cognition of the truth, whereas this movement is a path leading in the direction opposite to the truth, into darkness. It is not accidental that all your abstract constructions called philosophical systems are mutually contradictory, despite being based on the same logic. Step by step immersed in darkness as they move along the path of abstraction, step by step losing connection with the actual world, philosophical systems are gradually disoriented and reach the point at the dead end of that path, at which they give diametrically opposite answers to the nonsensical question about the primacy of matter or spirit. Logic based on ‘yes’ or ‘no’ always forces you to draw borders everywhere between different sets of properties in things, and due to the weakness of that logic entropy gets the leading role in the process of drawing the borders, which are therefore drawn very chaotically, illogically even from the viewpoint of your logic, and that is demonstrated with particular clarity by the different placement of those borders in the words of different human languages. The way these chaotic borders are drawn provides the basis for your method of communication, which you regard as one of the highest achievements of the human mind. The primitivity of language as a means for information exchange was demonstrated above by the calculation of the numbers of possible sensible and correct sentences.

Language as the main vehicle for information in its turn influences your thinking, forcing it to conform more strictly with the principle of discreteness. In particular, that is why your ethics and esthetics contain numerous paired notions mutually opposite as logical thesis and antithesis. Your social and individual morals are guided by rules that polarize the notions of “good” – “evil”, “life” – “death”, “gain” – “loss”, “acceptance” – “rejection”, “love” – “hate” and so on in the same vein. You are not helped even by your own observation that the sense of these diametrically opposite notions is different for different nations and changes with time even for the same nation. Even now, when you consider yourselves as highly civilized Humanity, you determine the guilt or innocence of the accused by the “yes” – “no” principle in court trial by jury, which might be admissible in deciding the fate of one person, but is totally unacceptable in deciding the destinies of nations. However, the same “yes’ – ‘no’ principle is predominant in national referenda or voting in parliaments. Moreover, discrete logic permits you to entrust the destinies of nations and Mankind to several individuals. In international politics “the state of peace” and “the state of war” are similar polar notions for you, and abrupt transition from one to the other, characteristic only of your logic and contrary to nature, is accomplished by you with truly insane determination. The recent world war and the evidently looming new world war demonstrate that the rapid development of your technological civilization has also failed to make you grow wiser. As far as your historical development is concerned, however, we find it very hard to make predictions because of that sharp discreteness and almost instantaneous transitions of your social structures and foreign policies from one state to another. For several millennia COD has witnessed practically incessant wars waged among you, and in the natural course of historical processes your wars could begin to subside only in 12 millennia, but COD cannot even assert that the wars will not cease within the coming century. Only the latter consideration enables us to regard the present appeal as not hopeless, since the agreement between Mankind and the Coalition can naturally be reached only after Mankind’s bellicose habits are eradicated.

Message aliens: Chapter III

COD has to treat Mankind with scepsis for two more reasons, resulting, incidentally, from the same primitivity of your logic, namely, your attitude to technological civilization and fear of individual death.

Technological advancement is no doubt beneficial in itself and motivates COD to regard Mankind with benevolence as an intelligent race. But we are worried by your worship of technology and, moreover, assigning it a role which makes it the main characteristic of your civilization.

Mankind’s history has proceeded chaotically. When certain regions of Earth had no direct communication links between them, Mankind in fact staged several experiments in creating different types of civilization. Some of them were approved by COD. Unfortunately, the diverse civilizations failed to coexist peacefully after the process of advancement and expansion provided means for direct contacts between them. As a rule, the civilization that was cruder, more primitive and therefore crueler destroyed the one that was more advanced and humane, only to be destroyed in its turn by a still cruder civilization.

At present Earth is dominated by the machine civilization, the most primitive of all. It has enveloped all Mankind, holding all of it under its sway, and will never allow the emergence of a new civilization, unless it destroys itself or unless Mankind takes over the control over the development of the machine civilization and gradually transforms it into a different type of civilization, much more vital for an intelligent race. COD hopes that an impulse for such restructuring may come from the present message and from the help that COD can afford to Mankind if it is needed and if Mankind voices the appropriate request. It should be mentioned that the regional civilizations whose centers were Apuradhapura at the time of the first message and Tqaatzetcoatl at the time of the second message satisfied Mankind’s needs much better than the contemporary machine civilization, and in one of the variants of its help COD can offer Mankind the most detailed description of those civilizations for adopting them as possible models. One of the most important properties for classifying a race as intelligent is that each of its members puts the activities of the collectivized mind above all else. Accordingly, man as an intelligent being must put the development of Mankind’s mind above all.

Man’s functions consist in assimilating information received from the preceding generation, distorting it by one’s own random conjectures and transmitting the distorted information to the next generation. Chaotic fluctuations in the movement of thought within an intelligent society are necessary, ensuring that after historical sifting zigzags in the movement of thought will be found without fail which correspond to the zigzags in the changing objective picture of existence. The direction of the latter is unpredictable, whereas any individual’s spectrum of thought retains a constant direction for one’s entire life span. Hence it follows that generation replacement is necessary for intelligent beings and man in particular, not just as living beings, but for the preservation and development of the mind. Hopes cherished by many members of Mankind that contact with intelligent races from other planets will help them solve the problem of eternal life are therefore utterly disastrous. On the other hand, we cannot deny Mankind appropriate assistance, however disastrous it might prove, since every intelligent race is entitled to determine its destiny by itself.

Message aliens: Chapter IV

COD does not decline contacts with Mankind and its individual members for discussing any questions and for rendering positive assistance in any problems of personal nature. But the main purpose of this message is to warn Mankind about the impending danger and to propose the entry of Mankind into the Coalition. The Coalition Statute together with the description of its structure and activities can be transmitted to Mankind for information with no additional conditions as soon as a request for them is published by the government of any of the four major states or by the League of Nations secretariat.

Should Mankind be inclined to join the Coalition, it will have to do preliminary work for restructuring the logical foundation of its thinking according to the outline of the basis for thinking generally adopted in the Coalition. This requirement is dictated not only by the danger that the defective type of thinking characteristic of contemporary Mankind would generate a progressing inferiority complex in Mankind after it joins the Coalition, but first and foremost by the inability of the races in the Coalition to exchange necessary information with Mankind because of their fundamentally different types of thinking, except perhaps on the most superficial level, an instance of which is of necessity the present message. Mankind would thus prove useless for the Coalition, and the Coalition would be just as useless for Mankind. Unless Mankind manages to restructure the logical foundation of its thinking we are powerless even to help you protect Earth from the cyclone. As we see it, Mankind will have to spend 60 to 70 millennia on restructuring the logical foundation, which is the critical term on account of the impending disaster. This work should therefore start without delay.

COD undertakes to transmit the initial course of continuous logic and detailed instructions for gradual inculcation of continuous logic thinking skills in the subsequent generations to Mankind on demand, but not before the diverse nations of Mankind stop their senseless conflicts and agree to focus their efforts on the protracted process of restructuring their thinking, because acquainting one of the warring nations with the principles of continuous logic thinking would be tantamount to giving them the absolute weapon and would eventually lead to the demise of Mankind. COD’s Third Message to Mankind is the last. Failure to respond within 50 years will be taken as proof that Mankind refuses to join the Coalition.

On behalf of the Coalition,

The Coalition’s Observer Detachment

You can believe or not believe that this message indeed has been transferred to us by aliens.


I have done a thorough analysis of this message, and as a result of long and painstaking work is a new scientific theory of world order, “The General Theory of Interactions”.


Analysis of the message of the Coalition’s Observer Detachment

 

The main conclusion from the analysis of the COD message is the following. The main obstacle in the development of humanity is the discrete approach in solution of the scientific, technical, social and personal problems.

Analyzing the COD message, proceed as follows.

The text of COD message is marked by yellow. Purple marked our objections or doubts. The COD message contains tips for us, for earthlings, so in case of detection, we will mark them in blue.


The message of the Coalition’s Observer Detachment



To the intelligent inhabitants of Earth, to the race that call themselves Mankind. This appeal by COD to earthlings is the third, monitoring message.

The first COD message was transmitted in 19576 (00576) B.C. to the inhabitants of the city of Apuradhapura, the largest on Earth at that time. The second message was transmitted by COD in 711 A.D. to the inhabitants of the city of Tqaatzetcoatl, then the largest on the American continent. Apparently, at the moment of the third message London also was one of the largest cities in the world, so here with logicality everything is all right. And of course the question is arisen how the COD message was transferred at that time?

The present COD message to earthlings is basically identical to the former two in content and is composed in the currently main languages of Earth – Chinese, English, Russian and Spanish. The text of the message is adjusted to the earthlings’ present level of knowledge and misconceptions. The purpose of the message is to propose negotiations to be conducted at some future time between representatives of Mankind and the Coalition on the subject of Mankind joining the Coalition. This part of the message is a very important that we will consider in more detail. We (earthlings) are proposed to conduct in some future negotiations on the subject joining the Coalition. Not today, not tomorrow, but in the future. I particularly note this moment because some hotheads among our “fellows” offered to begin negotiations right now, forgetting that to be able to negotiate, we need to fulfill several conditions.
As the negotiations can be conducted only after certain conditions have been met by Mankind, these conditions are listed below, preceded for their correct understanding by brief information of cosmogonic nature as well as a comparative characterization of Mankind’s way of thinking

The COD message, chapter I

Mankind’s notion of the Universe is on the whole more adequate now than it was at the times of the two previous messages. Indeed, Earth is not flat and is not at the center of the Universe.

Earth indeed orbits the Sun as one of the planets. The Sun is indeed not at the center of the Universe, but is a star in the Galaxy.

The last of energy transformations supporting the activity of stars and of the Sun accordingly, thereby enabling the existence of life on Earth and similar planets, is indeed the thermonuclear reaction.

The intelligent race of earthlings is indeed not the only one in the Universe. Most of your other cosmogonic conjectures are erroneous.

Your scientists’ belief in the existence of certain immutable laws of the Universe, even though undiscovered as yet, and in the stability of world constants is a misconception. Thus, the gravitational constant varies perceptibly even within your Solar system, let alone on larger scales, which has caused grave errors in your calculations of the dimensions of your Galaxy and of the distance to other galaxies, and it has also resulted in the emergence of fallacious theories of the closed Universe, as well as the recent theory of the dispersing Universe.

The world is chaotic, nothing in it is immutable, and that includes dimensionality. Space dimensionality in the Universe fluctuates and changes smoothly within very wide ranges. The best condition for the emergence of organic life is space dimensionality equal to π (3,14159...)

Why the π? Wide deviations from that value are detrimental to living nature. Space dimensionality in the vicinity of the Solar system is +3,00017... at present, and the proximity of this number to the integer 3 has misled you. How can we check this information?

The notion of universal three-dimensionality of space, on which your cosmogonic conceptions are mainly based, is also mistaken It is difficult to imagine the space with another dimensionality, especially if the dimensionality is not an integer-valued.

In the vicinity of your cluster of galaxies a gravitational cyclone is drifting with space dimensionality of –3,15... in its center, which can brush against your Galaxy, destroying organic life on all the planets where protection measures will not be taken.

Not an integer-valued meaning of dimensionality of the space can be imagined, but it’s difficult to describe the negative meaning of dimensionality. So what, we will try.

In particular, this circumstance makes it imperative for Mankind to join the Coalition as soon as possible, not later than 65 millennia since the transmission of the present message in 1929 A.D., in order to give the Coalition enough time to help Mankind in preparing for the cyclone.

It’s seems that accent on the date (1929) wouldn’t leave chances to humanity. But on the other hand, the message from 28.11.1977 and date up to the entry (65 000 years) give possibility to suppose that for advocates of truth of the message of COD is not all lost.

About 220 thousand intelligent races in your Galaxy have already joined the Coalition, and about a thousand intelligent races, including yours, are considering that step. COD is asking you not to treat our warning about the gravitational cyclone as an attempt to influence your response.

If these numbers are real, the level of mankind development can be considered much below average. On the one hand, it is a little bit upset, on the other hand we have the opportunity to grow intellectually much faster (of course if we can fulfill the conditions, and submit an “application” to join the Coalition). The question about that the mankind will accept the message about the gravitation cyclone as an attempt which influence on our response, may come to mind only the representative of extraterrestrial civilizations as it’s unlikely that Mankind plans own develop for such a period of time in future. And almost every single representative of earth in his soul believes that it doesn’t matter what will after us, though the deluge.

You are mistaken in your answer to the question about the origins of the Solar system and of life on Earth. The Solar system originated from a dust nebula seeded by the Coalition’s Construction Detachment in a region of the Universe satisfying the two basic requirements to the conditions for the emergence and development of organic life:

· sufficient distance from other stars;

· space dimensionality close to π.

A little that changes this remark, because somewhere, once life arose for the first time, in our case the process was simply repeated with little deviations to the side of variety or vice versa to the monotony, another attitude of mind.

You are mistaken in likening an intelligent race to a living individual as you envision Mankind’s senescence and death as inevitable at some future time. In the evolutionary process new species of living beings descend from some old species, and you should see to it that new species of intelligent races on Earth descend from yours.

You can agree with this statement with the high probability (because even Darwin talked about it). This point of view has to determine a strategy for the development of a reasonable race. There is a tip № 1.

Nevertheless, as COD has observed, Mankind is not at all guided by this or a similar strategy, leaving your development to providence and directing all your efforts towards the satisfaction of your short-term needs.

You should not think that your misconceptions are accidental, transient. They are inevitable and persistent due to the peculiarities of your thinking, a brief analysis of which is presented in the next chapter.

The COD message, chapter II

The thinking of living matter and the very existence and development of living matter rest on a common foundation. Both are counterflows to entropy. There is a tip № 2. In thinking this counterflow is expressed by the search for logicality. The search for logicality is intrinsic to your thinking as well, but the similarity of your thinking to the way of thinking intrinsic to most of the intelligent races in the Coalition goes no further than that.

This circumstance makes many members of COD doubt whether it is appropriate to address you as an intelligent race. Your logic is based on the notions of ‘yes’ and ‘no’ as presumably existing in reality and reiterating in step-by-step analysis of any complex problem, with the number of steps in the analysis being finite and mostly very small, even when a rather serious problem is considered. The search for the answer is confined to the choice of one out of two, where 2 is the number of steps, possible solutions, whereas the most adequate solution mostly lies between them. Indeed it is.

Your mathematicians will understand the following analogy: the solution of a problem emerging after particular questions of the yes-or-no type are solved is similar to the choice of a single vertex of an N-dimensional cube, whereas the space of possible solutions in the first approximation is all the points in the N-dimensional space. Without further specification the real dimensionality of the solution space is mostly determined by you erroneously and is very seldom really integer-valued. Mathematicians will understand, but for the rest we are going to explain below.

Our acceptance of you as an intelligent race is also hampered by the following considerations. As far as we can judge, some scientific or juridical law, the essence of a discovery or invention, the gist of some thought can be expressed by you in a sentence comprising at most 100 words from a vocabulary of 50 thousand, including mathematical and other conventional notations. The total number of possible sentences with such a vocabulary is a very modest figure equal to 50,000100. But if only sentences with linguistic (diagnostic) consistency are left, their number will go down to 50,00050.5. If sentences are then discarded in which the words are grammatically linked correctly, but their content has not even a shade of sense, the number of apparently sensible sentences will drop to 50,00025. Sifting false statements from true ones leaves, by the most liberal estimates, an inventory of at most 3,9 × 1037 statements that could be made by you and would be adequate to reality.

We agree with this assertion, although it can be weakly contested that language is constantly evolving. But in this sentence, if a good look, you can see a tip in the need to develop in person not linguistic modes of communication. There is a tip № 3.

Meanwhile representatives of the animal world on various planets are known to be capable of responding to various combinations of outer stimuli by no fewer diverse unconditional reactions quite adequate to reality, but cannot, however, be called intelligent.

What abilities do humanoids have on those planets?

Mankind should apparently be regarded more adequately as not an intelligent race, but intelligent potentially, because restricted thinking is not, after all, inherent in you.

Let's proceed from our reasonableness, and will do everything to join the Coalition

The human brain is naturally endowed with a thinking apparatus no less perfect than thinking organs of members of numerous intelligent races in the Universe. But from the very beginning the development of your thinking took an absolutely fallacious path.

There is a tip № 4. At the start of the development of the thinking process the ability to think is based on the potential possibility of diverse reactions to the same informational impact. In the graph, further referred to as the logical foundation, the force or perceptibility of the reaction to informational impact is set on the vertical line, while on the horizontal line the acceptability, pleasantness of the reaction is set to the right of zero and its unacceptability, unpleasantness to the left. Like everything in nature that has not yet been processed by the activity of the mind counteracting entropy, this graph is chaotic, the peaks of the curve in it are caused by purely physiological threshold effects, the self-education of the mind involves not only building the complex system of logical thinking, but also rebuilding and improving the foundation on which that system is based. As demonstrated by the example of numerous intelligent races, rebuilding the logical foundation in accordance with the outline presented below is the best way to meet the requirements for successful comprehension of nature.

It should be mentioned that several intelligent races in the Universe are known to us, whose logical foundation has a rectilinear structure with branches extending to infinity. The constitute their own Union of Races and are not members in the Coalition, because we have been unable to find a common language with them. The fundamental difference between their thinking and ours is that the area of the figure circumscribing the logical foundation is finite for us, but infinite in their thinking. We even find it hard to imagine how they perceive existence, and we cannot understand what preserves their life under the fierce impact of positive and negative informational forces extending to boundless infinity.

You can doubt in this question, but also you can find an explanation. For example, that their logical foundation can be represented only as spatial figure (but not flat), and then from our point of view, these branches extending to infinity, only are in other planes, which aren’t yet available and therefore aren’t understandable.

Man’s crude logical foundation has two visible peaks to the right and left of zero as well as a few minor ones. Its exploration shows that man has never had any obstacles to tuning your logical foundation in accordance with the outline generally adopted in the Universe. Nevertheless, man’s mind has developed in the totally fallacious way from the very start, guided by these peaks, and now has its own kind of logical foundation. These high peaks to the left and right of zero are what you call “no” and “yes”, without which you are unable in principle to conceive a phenomenon. However, you only obey the force of habit. The intentional splitting of the logical foundation into the notions of “no” and “yes” is the most serious obstacle on your path to comprehend existence. There is a tip № 5, perhaps the most important. Moreover, the theoretical investigations of logical thinking conducted by you only aggravate the fallacy instead of correcting it. Your theoretical logical systems operate only with refined notions of “yes” and “no”, ruling out other variants of logical reactions. These investigations are a step back even as compared with the logical foundation of man’s thinking as presented in the above graph, since the finite area of the figure circumscribing the logical foundation turns into zero.

It would be very sad if such a scenario of “development” was realized by Mankind in fact. It can be said in terms of your mathematical language that your logic is based on a discrete logical foundation instead of a continuous one, and the most primitive function with only two values is taken as its basis. The inevitable conclusion is that even if your way of perceiving existence can be called thinking, this is the most primitive of all the possible systems of thinking.

Discretization of logic forces you to expand the discretization principle onto all that exists. Thus the natural sequence, which is essentially a possible, but very artificial mathematical contrivance that has little to do with real nature, has become the basis for those rudiments of mathematics with which the overwhelming majority of Mankind are only familiar. You goal to count everything indiscriminately, but are incapable of accurately telling, say, the strength of wind, unless it is expressed numerically in points on a scale or in pressure on a square meter or mile, and these three numbers expressing the same strength of wind, will not evoke the same reaction from you until you carry out additional calculations to make certain that they indeed testify to the same.

One more tip which is similar to the tip № 3, but it’s about human “receivers” (locators), with their help person receives signals from the visual environment. So there is a tip № 6 offers us to develop our sense organs, perhaps even in those directions, which don’t show themselves now.

Arithmetical calculation has caused the appearance of puzzles induced not by world reality, but by the primitivity of your thinking. Nevertheless, you waste your efforts on trying to solve them and harmonize with your view of the world as actual natural enigmas – for instance, the disposition of rational and irrational numbers on the real axis.

Discretization of logic makes you dismember what is perceived integrally into disparate facts, phenomena, notions and categories, drawing artificial borders between them.

“Divide and rule”, said Nietzsche. We all divide, but it’s so far for our power over nature. Nevertheless, we believe that this is an important tip № 7.

Discretization of logic and the principle of calculation prompt you to regard the number of properties in a thing as finite and give names to each of them. This provides the highly questionable possibility to separate certain properties from others – a device you call abstraction. You regard moving by steps of abstraction towards more general properties as the only correct path to the cognition of the truth, whereas this movement is a path leading in the direction opposite to the truth, into darkness. It is not accidental that all your abstract constructions called philosophical systems are mutually contradictory, despite being based on the same logic. Step by step immersed in darkness as they move along the path of abstraction, step by step losing connection with the actual world, philosophical systems are gradually disoriented and reach the point at the dead end of that path, at which they give diametrically opposite answers to the nonsensical question about the primacy of matter or spirit. Logic based on “yes” or “no” always forces you to draw borders everywhere between different sets of properties in things, and due to the weakness of that logic entropy gets the leading role in the process of drawing the borders, which are therefore drawn very chaotically, illogically even from the viewpoint of your logic, and that is demonstrated with particular clarity by the different placement of those borders in the words of different human languages. The way these chaotic borders are drawn provides the basis for your method of communication, which you regard as one of the highest achievements of the human mind. The primitivity of language as a means for information exchange was demonstrated above by the calculation of the numbers of possible sensible and correct sentences. Let's think that it’s emphasis on the tip № 3.

Language as the main vehicle for information in its turn influences your thinking, forcing it to conform more strictly with the principle of discreteness. In particular, that is why your ethics and esthetics contain numerous paired notions mutually opposite as logical thesis and antithesis. Your social and individual morals are guided by rules that polarize the notions of “good” – “evil”, “life” – “death”, “gain” – “loss”, “acceptance” – “rejection”, “love” – “hate” and so on in the same vein. You are not helped even by your own observation that the sense of these diametrically opposite notions is different for different nations and changes with time even for the same nation. Even now, when you consider yourselves as highly civilized Humanity, you determine the guilt or innocence of the accused by the “yes” – “no” principle in court trial by jury, which might be admissible in deciding the fate of one person, but is totally unacceptable in deciding the destinies of nations. However, the same “yes’ – “no” principle is predominant in national referenda or voting in parliaments. Moreover, discrete logic permits you to entrust the destinies of nations and Mankind to several individuals. In international politics “the state of peace” and “the state of war” are similar polar notions for you, and abrupt transition from one to the other, characteristic only of your logic and contrary to nature, is accomplished by you with truly insane determination. The recent world war and the evidently looming new world war demonstrate that the rapid development of your technological civilization has also failed to make you grow wiser. As far as your historical development is concerned, however, we find it very hard to make predictions because of that sharp discreteness and almost instantaneous transitions of your social structures and foreign policies from one state to another. For several millennia COD has witnessed practically incessant wars waged among you, and in the natural course of historical processes your wars could begin to subside only in 12 millennia, but COD cannot even assert that the wars will not cease within the coming century. Even if they doubt, apparently, there is a chance.

Only the latter consideration enables us to regard the present appeal as not hopeless, since the agreement between Mankind and the Coalition can naturally be reached only after Mankind’s bellicose habits are eradicated.

There is a tip № 8 which shows the direction of the main actions for achieve the desired result.

The COD message, chapter III

COD has to treat Mankind with scepsis for two more reasons, resulting, incidentally, from the same primitivity of your logic, namely, your attitude to technological civilization and fear of individual death.

Technological advancement is no doubt beneficial in itself and motivates COD to regard Mankind with benevolence as an intelligent race. But we are worried by your worship of technology and, moreover, assigning it a role which makes it the main characteristic of your civilization.

Also we agree with it, but this agreement implies that there should be an alternative to the current direction of human development. And if so, then you can think that there is a tip № 9.

Mankind’s history has proceeded chaotically. When certain regions of Earth had no direct communication links between them, Mankind in fact staged several experiments in creating different types of civilization. Some of them were approved by COD. Unfortunately, the diverse civilizations failed to coexist peacefully after the process of advancement and expansion provided means for direct contacts between them. As a rule, the civilization that was cruder, more primitive and therefore crueler destroyed the one that was more advanced and humane, only to be destroyed in its turn by a still cruder civilization.

At present Earth is dominated by the machine civilization, the most primitive of all. It has enveloped all Mankind, holding all of it under its sway, and will never allow the emergence of a new civilization, unless it destroys itself or unless Mankind takes over the control over the development of the machine civilization and gradually transforms it into a different type of civilization, much more vital for an intelligent race. There is a repeat of the tip № 9.

COD hopes that an impulse for such restructuring may come from the present message and from the help that COD can afford to Mankind if it is needed and if Mankind voices the appropriate request. Unfortunately, it hasn’t happened yet.

It should be mentioned that the regional civilizations whose centers were Apuradhapura at the time of the first message and Tqaatzetcoatl at the time of the second message satisfied Mankind’s needs much better than the contemporary machine civilization, and in one of the variants of its help COD can offer Mankind the most detailed description of those civilizations for adopting them as possible models. Thanks in advance.

One of the most important properties for classifying a race as intelligent is that each of its members puts the activities of the collectivized mind above all else. Accordingly, man as an intelligent being must put the development of Mankind’s mind above all. The strategy tip № 10

Man’s functions consist in assimilating information received from the preceding generation, distorting it by one’s own random conjectures and transmitting the distorted information to the next generation. Chaotic fluctuations in the movement of thought within an intelligent society are necessary, ensuring that after historical sifting zigzags in the movement of thought will be found without fail which correspond to the zigzags in the changing objective picture of existence. The direction of the latter is unpredictable, whereas any individual’s spectrum of thought retains a constant direction for one’s entire life span. Hence it follows that generation replacement is necessary for intelligent beings and man in particular, not just as living beings, but for the preservation and development of the mind. Hopes cherished by many members of Mankind that contact with intelligent races from other planets will help them solve the problem of eternal life are therefore utterly disastrous. On the other hand, we cannot deny Mankind appropriate assistance, however disastrous it might prove, since every intelligent race is entitled to determine its destiny by itself.

If the problem of eternal life doesn’t matter, then it is necessary to make the death doesn’t scare the representatives of humanity. Let's think that there is a tip № 11, and at the same time an incentive.

The COD message, chapter IV

COD does not decline contacts with Mankind and its individual members for discussing any questions and for rendering positive assistance in any problems of personal nature. We will take it into account.

But the main purpose of this message is to warn Mankind about the impending danger and to propose the entry of Mankind into the Coalition.(emphasis by Ipatov Pavel).

The Coalition Statute together with the description of its structure and activities can be transmitted to Mankind for information with no additional conditions as soon as a request for them is published by the government of any of the four major states or by the League of Nations secretariat.

Should Mankind be inclined to join the Coalition, it will have to do preliminary work for restructuring the logical foundation of its thinking according to the outline of the basis for thinking generally adopted in the Coalition. This requirement is dictated not only by the danger that the defective type of thinking characteristic of contemporary Mankind would generate a progressing inferiority complex in Mankind after it joins the Coalition, but first and foremost by the inability of the races in the Coalition to exchange necessary information with Mankind because of their fundamentally different types of thinking, except perhaps on the most superficial level, an instance of which is of necessity the present message. Mankind would thus prove useless for the Coalition, and the Coalition would be just as useless for Mankind. Unless Mankind manages to restructure the logical foundation of its thinking we are powerless even to help you protect Earth from the cyclone. As we see it, Mankind will have to spend 60 to 70 millennia on restructuring the logical foundation, which is the critical term on account of the impending disaster. This work should therefore start without delay.

What can we object, it’s difficult for man to speak with cockroaches.

COD undertakes to transmit the initial course of continuous logic and detailed instructions for gradual inculcation of continuous logic thinking skills in the subsequent generations to Mankind on demand, but not before the diverse nations of Mankind stop their senseless conflicts and agree to focus their efforts on the protracted process of restructuring their thinking, because acquainting one of the warring nations with the principles of continuous logic thinking would be tantamount to giving them the absolute weapon and would eventually lead to the demise of Mankind.

COD’s Third Message to Mankind is the last. Failure to respond within 50 years will be taken as proof that Mankind refuses to join the Coalition.


On behalf of the Coalition,

The Coalition’s Observer Detachment

Here we’ll note the main conclusions from the analysis of COD message.

Discreteness of logical thinking of earthlings is the main obstacle to the development of our civilization, as in science, and thus, technically, and socially.

The principle of continuity was taken by me as the basis for the establishment of “The General Theory of Interactions”, that is we used some extent help of the tips №№ 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, bolding text has also been taken for establishing of “The General Theory of Interactions”.

The tips № 1 and № 10 reveal to us the future, they are say that with the time humanity will become another race, and we must become “reasonable” predecessors of the race. Moreover, the emphasis in development we must turn to the development of intellectual abilities rather than technique.

The tip № 8 makes it clear that the warlike habits, indulgence which seems to be motivated scientific progress, must go in the past. The collective intellectual engagement must come instead of it (the tip № 10).

We need to find a promising alternative to mechanical civilization (the tip № 9).

The development of intelligence will allow us forget about fear of death (tip № 11), understanding that it’s a natural process of development, and will shift resources, which are concentrated now in this area, at more perspective directions.

Analysis of the COD message will be continued, because the polysemy of words can lead to another reading of the meaning of the message.

Go to “The General Theory of Interactions”.

Search on pages of a site


 


S I T E M A P S



Pages of a site in Russian contain more text and animation films.
To pass to the main page of the general theory of interactions.



Search on pages of a site

The General Theory of Interactions

The basic principle of the universe

Bion structure

Particles of the matter (new theory)

Neutrino, antimatter and black holes

Common observations

Principle of continuity and a human society

Details

Questions kosmology

Information basis of physical processes

Physical basis of information processes

Technical solutions

Dark energy and dark matter

Decoding of circles on fields. The new way of reception of the information from a circle on a floor is offered. 

Mayan prophecy on doomsday 21.12.2012.


  The Doomsday 2012 – 14 versions  




 ©  The general theory of interactions - all rights reserved.


     At use of materials the reference is obligatory on  http://www.b-i-o-n.ru/general-theory-of-interactions/
Работает на: Amiro CMS